Freeman v. Gross
This text of 267 A.D. 1032 (Freeman v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted controversy determined in favor of plaintiff, without costs. First question submitted answered “ No ”. In view of the answer to the first question the second question not answered. (See Freer v. Glen Springs Sanitarium, Go., 131 App. Div. 352; Van Be Bogert v. B,eformed Butch Church, 219 App. Div. 220; Allen v. Trustees of Great Neck Free Church, 240 App. Div. 206, 212, affd. 265 N. Y. 570.) AH concur, except Larkin, J., not voting. (Submission of controversy in an action to compel specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real and personal property belonging to plaintiff in the city of Utica.) Present — ■ Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and Larkin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 1032, 48 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-gross-nyappdiv-1944.