Freeman v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2007·No. 04-35797·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLA FREEMAN,  No. 04-35797 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.

v.

 CV-04-00666-PA

District of Oregon,

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Portland Respondent-Appellee.

 ORDER

Filed May 29, 2007

Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the order denying Freeman’s petition for a writ of mandamus in case number 06-75539, we DENY Freeman’s motion for an order to show cause why respondent William McNamee should not be sanctioned for contempt, filed on November 22, 2006.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. Gonzales, (9th Cir. 2007).

Freeman v. Gonzales (Freeman v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.