Freeman v. Gonzales
This text of Freeman v. Gonzales (Freeman v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLA FREEMAN, No. 04-35797 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-04-00666-PA District of Oregon, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Portland Respondent-Appellee. ORDER
Filed May 29, 2007
Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the order denying Freeman’s peti- tion for a writ of mandamus in case number 06-75539, we DENY Freeman’s motion for an order to show cause why respondent William McNamee should not be sanctioned for contempt, filed on November 22, 2006.
6263 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freeman v. Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-gonzales-ca9-2007.