Freeman v. Freeman

New York Supreme Court

Freeman v. Freeman

8 Abb. N. Cas. 174

DecidedSeptember 15, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Abb. N. Cas. 174 (Freeman v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. Freeman, 8 Abb. N. Cas. 174 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

The superior court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner, and of the subject-matter. The order making an allowance to the wife for • alimony and counsel fee, upon the dismissal of the complaint, was also in accordance with the established practice of the late court of chancery (Germond v. Germond, 1 Paige Ch. 83). .And the superior court also had power to punish the petitioner for his contempt in refusing to obey its order.

The application to discharge the petitioner must, therefore, be denied, and he must be remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, J.

The superior court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner, and of the subject-matter. The order making an allowance to the wife for • alimony and counsel fee, upon the dismissal of the complaint, was also in accordance with the established practice of the late court of chancery (Germond v. Germond, 1 Paige Ch. 83). .And the superior court also had power to punish the petitioner for his contempt in refusing to obey its order.

The application to discharge the petitioner must, therefore, be denied, and he must be remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Abb. N. Cas. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-freeman-nysupct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack