Freeman v. Foster

55 Me. 508
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1868·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Danforth, J.

This is an action for a breach of the covenant against incumbrances,, contained in a deed from the defendants to the plaintiffs, dated March 22, 1856. In the same deed the premises conveyed are described as " subject to a mortgage given to Moses' Pattee by said Foster and Buck, dated Feb. 15, 1856.” It is evident lhat the covenants in a deed are applicable to, and coextensive with, the premises conveyed. In this deed, the interest in the premises covered by the mortgage was not conveyed, and it must [510] necessarily follow that the covenant did not apply to that incumbrance. As the case finds no other 'incumbrance, there' is no breach of the covenant. The doctrine of Kinsman v. Lowell, 84 Maine, 299, is decisive of this case.

Plaintiffs nonsuit.

Walton, Dickerson, Barrows and Taplev, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. Foster, 55 Me. 508 (Me. 1868).

55 Me. 508 (Freeman v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zandri v. Tendler
193 A. 598 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1937)
Schafroth v. Ross
289 F. 703 (Eighth Circuit, 1923)
Toney v. Dewey
78 So. 887 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Fitzgerald v. Flanagan
135 N.W. 738 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
Schaad v. Robinson
109 P. 1072 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Miller v. De Graffenried
43 Colo. 306 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)
Hall v. Allis
47 A. 114 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1900)