Freeman v. Fillingame

476 S.E.2d 264, 267 Ga. 168, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3458, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 722
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 7, 1996·No. S96A1498·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

The heirs of Bartemus Freeman seek to restrain Alice F. Fillingame from cutting timber on 3.575 acres of land. Although the Free-mans claim that their father obtained the land in the 1950s, they present no evidence of title. In a previous action between the same parties or their privies, the superior court found that Fillingame was the owner of fee simple title to the disputed property and the Free-mans did not appeal. Since that action decided the issue of title in Fillingame’s favor, the trial court properly dismissed the Freemans’ complaint for a preliminary restraining order on the grounds of res judicata. See OCGA § 9-12-40. Therefore, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. Fillingame, 476 S.E.2d 264, 267 Ga. 168, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3458, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 722 (Ga. 1996).

476 S.E.2d 264 (Freeman v. Fillingame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ChoicePoint Services, Inc. v. Hiers
644 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)