Freeman v. Feder
This text of 119 A. 924 (Freeman v. Feder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contest in this case is over the prohate of the last will and testament of .Charles Peder. The contest was made on the ground of undue influence. The will was admitted to probate hy the orphans court of Passaic county.
On an appeal to the prerogative court the decree of the orphans court of Passaic county was affirmed and the appeal dismissed. We have examined the voluminous record with the result that we have reached the same conclusions as the orphans court of Passaic county and the prerogative court. The questions involved are largely questions of fact.
The decree of the prerogative court affirming the decree • of the orphans court of'Passaic county should he affirmed and the same is hereby affirmed.
For affirmance—Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner'—7.
For reversal-— The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Bergen, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A. 924, 94 N.J. Eq. 196, 9 Stock. 196, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-feder-nj-1922.