Freeman v. County of Sacramento Dept of Human Assistance
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 BENNIE FREEMAN, No. 2:19-cv-02418-KJM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENYING IFP DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTING PAYMENT SCHEDULE 15 ASSISTANCE, et al.
16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending before 19 the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 20 (authorizing the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a 21 person that is unable to pay such fees). (ECF No. 2.) 22 On December 3, 2019, plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action and 23 requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) 24 At present, the filing fee to commence a civil case in this court is $400.00. The court may 25 authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security therefor” by a 26 person that is unable to pay such fees or provide security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). 27 Plaintiff’s financial declaration indicates he has a combined monthly income of $5,984.00. (ECF 28 No. 2 at 1.) According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the 1 poverty guideline for a household of 4 persons (not in Alaska or Hawaii) is $21,330.00 for 2019. 2 See https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines. Thus, plaintiff’s annual gross household income of 3 $71,808.00 is over 330% of the 2019 poverty guideline. Additionally, although plaintiff is still 4 making mortgage payments, he and his spouse are the owners of a home with an approximate 5 value of $370,000.00; and two cars worth $19,000.00. (ECF No. 2 at 3.) As a result, the court 6 finds that plaintiff does not qualify for a waiver of the $400.00 filing fee. 7 Nevertheless, the court is also cognizant that plaintiff has relatively little in the way of 8 post-expenses income, and that a one-time $400 payment may represent a significant strain on his 9 monthly budget. Plaintiff claims regular combined monthly expenses of $6,691.00. (ECF No. 2 10 at 4–5.) Plaintiff also states he and his spouse provide support for two children, expenses for 11 which vary from month to month. (Id. at 5.) Thus, after plaintiff’s listed expenses are deducted 12 from his net income, he does not have any remaining expendable income. 13 To be sure, the court is sympathetic to the fact that plaintiff does not appear to have a 14 large income and plaintiff also has several expenses to contend with. However, numerous 15 litigants in this court have significant monthly expenditures and may have to make difficult 16 choices as to which expenses to incur, which expenses to reduce or eliminate, and how to 17 apportion their income between such expenses and litigating an action in federal court. Such 18 difficulties alone, however, do not amount to indigency. 19 Therefore, the court finds it appropriate to instead recommend requiring monthly 20 payments of $50.00 until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full on the schedule outlined below. 21 The court with further recommend that once plaintiff’s first payment is made, the court shall 22 direct service of the complaint on the named defendant. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be denied; 25 2. Plaintiff be directed to pay the filing fee of $400.00 on an installment schedule, with 26 $50.00 payments to the Clerk of Court due on the following deadlines: 27 February 1, 2020 28 March 1, 2020 1 April 1, 2020 2 May 1, 2020 3 June 1, 2020 4 July 1, 2020 5 August 1, 2020 6 September 1, 2020 7 3. Once the first installment payment is made, the court shall direct service of the 8 | complaint on the named defendant; and 9 4. Plaintiff be informed that a failure to timely pay the filing fee, or timely request an 10 | extension of time to do so, may result in dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 11 | Procedure 41(b). 12 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 13 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within fourteen days 14 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, the parties may file written 15 | objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 16 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that 17 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 18 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 19 | Dated: December 12, 2019 bh rdf /f [ { gt 20 CAROLYN K DELANEY 2] UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 | 15 freeman2418.f&r.deny.ifp 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeman v. County of Sacramento Dept of Human Assistance (Freeman v. County of Sacramento Dept of Human Assistance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.