Freeman v. Cornwell
This text of 15 A. 873 (Freeman v. Cornwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From the facts, as found by the learned judge, we are not prepared to say that his conclusion and judgment were wrong. We cannot reverse if the facts were such as warranted their submission to a jury, had the case not been withdrawn from that body by the submission of the parties. That they must have been so submitted, we have no doubt; hence, as the judge of the common pleas was, by that submission, substituted for the jury, we cannot reverse unless his conclusions were clearly unwarranted by the evidence. As this is not the case, as there was proof to show the misleading character of the assessments by which Bonner may have been deceived, nothing remains for us but an affirmance of the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A. 873, 2 Monag. 500, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-cornwell-pa-1888.