Freeman v. City of New York

243 A.D.2d 538, 665 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated October 21, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Steinhardt at the Supreme Court (see also, Putnam v Stout, 38 NY2d 607; Guzman v Hazen Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559; Barnett v City of Yonkers, 731 F Supp 594). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. City of New York, 243 A.D.2d 538, 665 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 538 (Freeman v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnett v. City of Yonkers
731 F. Supp. 594 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Putnam v. Stout
345 N.E.2d 319 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Guzman v. Haven Plaza Housing Development Fund Co.
509 N.E.2d 51 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)