Freeman v. City of Montgomery

59 So. 2d 358, 36 Ala. App. 473, 1952 Ala. App. LEXIS 396, 1952 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 139
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 27, 1952·No. 3 Div. 948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

This prosecution is based on a violation of a city ordinance. Upon conviction in the recorder’s court, the accused took an appeal to the circuit court. The instant appeal follows a judgment of conviction in the latter jurisdiction.

Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief in this court; neither has he assigned errors.

Prosecutions for the violations o>f municipal ordinances are in their nature quasi criminal, and on appeal to the appellate court errors must be duly assigned. Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571; Arnold v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala. App. 94, 30 So.2d 40.

The judgment of conviction 'in the court below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. City of Montgomery, 59 So. 2d 358, 36 Ala. App. 473, 1952 Ala. App. LEXIS 396, 1952 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 139 (Ala. Ct. App. 1952).

59 So. 2d 358 (Freeman v. City of Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyatt v. City of Birmingham
72 So. 2d 735 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)
Jackson v. City of Montgomery
59 So. 2d 688 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1952)