Freeman v. City of Montgomery

Alabama Court of Appeals

Freeman v. City of Montgomery

59 So. 2d 358, 36 Ala. App. 473, 1952 Ala. App. LEXIS 396, 1952 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 139

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 27, 1952

Docket3 Div. 948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 So. 2d 358 (Freeman v. City of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. City of Montgomery, 59 So. 2d 358, 36 Ala. App. 473, 1952 Ala. App. LEXIS 396, 1952 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 139 (Ala. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

This prosecution is based on a violation of a city ordinance. Upon conviction in the recorder’s court, the accused took an appeal to the circuit court. The instant appeal follows a judgment of conviction in the latter jurisdiction.

Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief in this court; neither has he assigned errors.

Prosecutions for the violations o>f municipal ordinances are in their nature quasi criminal, and on appeal to the appellate court errors must be duly assigned. Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571; Arnold v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala. App. 94, 30 So.2d 40.

The judgment of conviction 'in the court below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI