Freeman v. City of Dallas
This text of 186 F.3d 601 (Freeman v. City of Dallas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-10907
CHARLES FREEMAN; ROSALYN BROWN
Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
versus
CITY OF DALLAS
Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas - - - - -
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion August 18, 1999, 5 Cir., 1999, _____F.3d____)
(January 10, 2000)
Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a
poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the
judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a
rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court
en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The
Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of
supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 F.3d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-city-of-dallas-ca5-2000.