Freeman v. City of Dallas

186 F.3d 601
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 2000
Docket97-10907
StatusPublished

This text of 186 F.3d 601 (Freeman v. City of Dallas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman v. City of Dallas, 186 F.3d 601 (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10907

CHARLES FREEMAN; ROSALYN BROWN

Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants

versus

CITY OF DALLAS

Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas - - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 18, 1999, 5 Cir., 1999, _____F.3d____)

(January 10, 2000)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a

poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the

judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court

en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The

Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swindle v. Livingston Parish School Board
655 F.3d 386 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 F.3d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-city-of-dallas-ca5-2000.