Freeman v. Carpenter

16 N.E. 714, 147 Mass. 23, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 47
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 4, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 N.E. 714 (Freeman v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman v. Carpenter, 16 N.E. 714, 147 Mass. 23, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 47 (Mass. 1888).

Opinion

Morton, C. J.

This is a bill in equity to enjoin the defendants from levying upon the plaintiff’s land executions which [24]*24issued upon judgments against her husband. The defendants attached the land under the Pub. Sts. c. 161, § 66, as land of the husband which had been fraudulently conveyed to the plaintiff.

The statutes provide that any land of a debtor which has been fraudulently conveyed by him, or of which the record title has been conveyed to a third person, for the purpose of defrauding his creditors, may be taken on execution, and that, where land thus fraudulently held is levied on, the judgment creditor, or the purchaser at the sale, must within one year after the return day of the execution commence his suit to recover possession of the land, or the levy will be void. Pub. Sts. c. 172, §§ 1, 49.

This bill seeks to restrain the defendants from pursuing the remedy thus clearly given to them by the statutes. It alleges no peculiar circumstances which make this remedy unjust or inequitable as applied to this case. If this bill can be maintained, then in every case where a judgment creditor avails himself of the statute remedy the trial of the case may be transferred from a court of law to a court of equity. It is uniformly held that a court of equity will not issue an injunction to stay proceedings at law where the case can be fully and fairly tried at law. Fuller v. Cadwell, 6 Allen, 503. Payson v. Lamson, 134 Mass. 593.

In the case at bar all the issues raised by the plaintiff can be fully and fairly tried in the proceedings at law provided by the statute. Her rights are thus fully protected. The decree of the Superior Court must be reversed, and the demurrers of the defendants sustained.

Demurrers sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Itek Corp. v. McEnness
164 N.E.2d 636 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1960)
Shea v. Peters
230 Mass. 197 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Dunbar v. Kelly
75 N.E. 740 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Home Savings & Trust Co. v. Hicks
89 N.W. 103 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.E. 714, 147 Mass. 23, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-carpenter-mass-1888.