Freeman v. Brown

87 P. 204, 4 Cal. App. 108, 1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 67
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 12, 1906
DocketCiv. No. 291.
StatusPublished

This text of 87 P. 204 (Freeman v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman v. Brown, 87 P. 204, 4 Cal. App. 108, 1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 67 (Cal. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinions

The COURT.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to amend his statement on motion for a new trial by inserting specifications therein. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable.

Appellant by his motion and application sought relief under section 473, Code of Civil Procedure. The order denying such relief is appealable. (Murphy v. Stelling, 138 Cal. 642, [72 Pac. 176]; Kaltschmidt v. Weber, 136 Cal. 675, [69 Pac. 497].)

Motion to dismiss is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaltschmidt v. Weber
69 P. 497 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Murphy v. Stelling
72 P. 176 (California Supreme Court, 1903)
Calderwood v. Peyser
42 Cal. 110 (California Supreme Court, 1871)
Clark v. Crane
57 Cal. 629 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Griess v. State Investment & Insurance
28 P. 1041 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Stonesifer v. Kilburn
29 P. 332 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Sutton v. Symons
32 P. 588 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Posachane Water Co. v. Standart
32 P. 532 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Sutton v. Symons
35 P. 158 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Symons v. Bunnell
35 P. 770 (California Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 P. 204, 4 Cal. App. 108, 1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-brown-calctapp-1906.