Freeman v. Brown

87 P. 204, 4 Cal. App. 108, 1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 67
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freeman v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Cal. App. 516
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 12, 1906·No. Civ. No. 291.·Published

Opinions

The COURT.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to amend his statement on motion for a new trial by inserting specifications therein. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable.

Appellant by his motion and application sought relief under section 473, Code of Civil Procedure. The order denying such relief is appealable. (Murphy v. Stelling, 138 Cal. 642, [72 Pac. 176]; Kaltschmidt v. Weber, 136 Cal. 675, [69 Pac. 497].)

Motion to dismiss is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. Brown, 87 P. 204, 4 Cal. App. 108, 1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 67 (Cal. Ct. App. 1906).

87 P. 204 (Freeman v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaltschmidt v. Weber
69 P. 497 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Murphy v. Stelling
72 P. 176 (California Supreme Court, 1903)
Calderwood v. Peyser
42 Cal. 110 (California Supreme Court, 1871)
Clark v. Crane
57 Cal. 629 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Griess v. State Investment & Insurance
28 P. 1041 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Stonesifer v. Kilburn
29 P. 332 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Sutton v. Symons
32 P. 588 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Posachane Water Co. v. Standart
32 P. 532 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Sutton v. Symons
35 P. 158 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Symons v. Bunnell
35 P. 770 (California Supreme Court, 1894)