Freeman v. Brown
55 Cal. 465
Opinion
"We are inclined to think that the Court had authority to consider the stipulation in connection with the affidavit, and that the stipulation and affidavit justified it in making the order. We will affirm this order.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeman v. Brown, 55 Cal. 465 (Cal. 1880).
55 Cal. 465 (Freeman v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Successors of L. Villamil & Co. v. Merced
25 P.R. 219 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1917)
Sucesores de L. Villamil & Co. v. Merced
25 P.R. Dec. 237 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1917)
Mally v. Roberts
167 Iowa 523 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1914)
Cabanne v. Macadaras
91 Mo. App. 70 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.
57 N.E. 148 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1900)