Freeman v. Biloxi Regional

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1996·No. 95-60312·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60312

PATRICIA FREEMAN, Individually and as Guardian of Victor Freeman, a minor, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jacqueline Freeman,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BILOXI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.;

BILOXI HMA, INC., d/b/a Biloxi Regional Medical Center, Inc.,

Defendants,

and

NOEL JOHNSON, M.D.; BILOXI OB/GYN CLINIC, P.A.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (1:93cv158BrR)

April 9, 1996

Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and JOLLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

After considering the briefs and argument of counsel and relevant portions of the record, we conclude that this appeal presents no reversible error. The district court did not err in refusing plaintiff’s requested jury instruction number 15 as it was an incorrect statement of the law, as the trial court informed plaintiff’s counsel. See Hunnicutt v. Wright, 986 F.2d 119 (5th Cir. 1993). We reject plaintiff’s complaint on appeal that the court erred by failing to give any instruction on this subject matter. Plaintiff failed to adequately preserve this point for appeal; moreover, it does not appear that the evidence warranted such an instruction. Plaintiff’s remaining points are without merit and do not warrant discussion.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. Biloxi Regional, (5th Cir. 1996).

Freeman v. Biloxi Regional (Freeman v. Biloxi Regional) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related