Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.
591 A.2d 812, 218 Conn. 910, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 245
Opinion
The defendants Alamo Management Company and Duane Boise’s and the plaintiff Alice Freeman’s petitions for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 124, are granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. What is the standard of proof for double damages arising out of the violation of the unlawful entry and detainer statute?
“2. Did the trial court apply the appropriate standard of proof?
“3. If the trial court applied the wrong standard of proof, is a retrial limited to damages appropriate?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeman v. Alamo Management Co., 591 A.2d 812, 218 Conn. 910, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 245 (Colo. 1991).
591 A.2d 812 (Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.
607 A.2d 370 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)