Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.
591 A.2d 812, 218 Conn. 910, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 245
This text of 591 A.2d 812 (Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Freeman v. Alamo Management Co., 591 A.2d 812, 218 Conn. 910, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 245 (Colo. 1991).
Opinion
The defendants Alamo Management Company and Duane Boise’s and the plaintiff Alice Freeman’s petitions for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 124, are granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. What is the standard of proof for double damages arising out of the violation of the unlawful entry and detainer statute?
“2. Did the trial court apply the appropriate standard of proof?
“3. If the trial court applied the wrong standard of proof, is a retrial limited to damages appropriate?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.
607 A.2d 370 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
591 A.2d 812, 218 Conn. 910, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-alamo-management-co-conn-1991.