Freeman v. 103 East 86th Street Realty Corp.
This text of 196 Misc. 297 (Freeman v. 103 East 86th Street Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for a temporary injunction is granted to the extent hereinafter set forth; otherwise denied. Since the defendant concedes that sixteen hours of doorman service was supplied between 1943 and 1946, it will be required to furnish an equal amount of service. The defendant will also be required to furnish twenty-four-hour elevator operator.service upon one of the passenger elevators (Goldberg v. Grant, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 4, 1948, p. 1032, col. 6, mod. 274 App. Div. 993). The cause will be preferred and set at the head of the Ready Calendar of Special Term, Part III, for the 4th day óf April, 1949. Settle order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 Misc. 297, 92 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-103-east-86th-street-realty-corp-nysupct-1949.