Freeman, James Ernest
This text of Freeman, James Ernest (Freeman, James Ernest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These are post-conviction applications for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3. Applicant was convicted of forgery and possession of amphetamine. Punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction, was assessed at confinement for fifteen years. There was no appeal from these convictions.
Applicant contends that he has not received credit for time he was confined in Indiana for three periods between April 2001 to September 2003, pursuant to parole violator warrants in these causes. The trial court has entered no findings of fact.
It is this Court's opinion that additional facts need to be developed, and since this Court cannot hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum. The trial court may resolve those issues as set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d), TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC., in that it may order affidavits, depositions, or interrogatories from both the criminal institutions and parole divisions of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, or it may order a hearing.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing the court should first decide whether Applicant is indigent. If the trial court finds that Applicant is indigent, and Applicant desires representation by counsel, the trial court shall then appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing pursuant to the provisions of Article 26.04, TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.
Following the receipt of additional information the trial court should make findings of fact as to: what credit Applicant has been given for time he was confined on parole violator warrants; what dates, if any, that Applicant was confined in Indiana between 2001 and 2003 pursuant to parole violator warrants in these causes; and whether Applicant has presented this claim to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice office of time credit resolution. The trial court should also make any further findings of fact and conclusions of law which it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus will be held in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. Resolution of the issues shall be accomplished by the trial court within 60 days of the date of this order. (1) A supplemental transcript containing any affidavits, exhibits, or transcription of the court reporter's notes from any evidentiary hearing, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 90 days of the date of this order. (2)
DELIVERED: December 14, 2005
DO NOT PUBLISH
1. 1 In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the
continuance should be provided to this Court.
2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freeman, James Ernest, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-james-ernest-texcrimapp-2005.