Freeman, Ex Parte Tyler Anderson

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 5, 2008
DocketAP-76,029
StatusPublished

This text of Freeman, Ex Parte Tyler Anderson (Freeman, Ex Parte Tyler Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman, Ex Parte Tyler Anderson, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. AP-76,029




EX PARTE TYLER ANDERSON FREEMAN, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM CAUSE NO. 04-CR-0360-H IN THE 347TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY




            Per curiam.



O P I N I O N


           This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus that was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to tampering with a governmental records and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal this conviction.

           On May 23, 2005, after Applicant was sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s (TDCJ’s) custody to begin serving the instant sentence, Kerr County issued a bench warrant for Applicant so that he could answer charges there. After those proceedings were complete on August 31, 2005, Kerr County erroneously released Applicant instead of sending him back to the custody of TDCJ to continue serving his sentence under the instant cause. TDCJ issued an arrest warrant for Applicant on December 7, 2005 when they realized that he had been released from custody by Kerr County. Applicant was returned to TDCJ custody on June 12, 2006. During his time on erroneous release, Applicant violated no laws or any terms of release that would have applied to him if he had been properly released on parole or mandatory supervision.

            Applicant contends that he has been denied time credit toward the expiration of his sentence for the time when he was erroneously released, through no fault of his own.

           The trial court has found that Applicant is entitled to credit for the period of time he spent erroneously released. After a review of the record, we have determined that the trial court’s finding is correct. Ex parte Hale, 117 S.W.3d 866, 873 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Therefore, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice shall credit Applicant’s sentence in cause number 04-CR-0360-H from the 347th Judicial District Court of Nueces County with all of the time from the date of Applicant’s erroneous release on August 31, 2005, until his return to TDCJ custody on June 12, 2006.

           Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, and the Board of Pardons and Paroles Division.

DELIVERED: November 5, 2008

DO NOT PUBLISH           

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Hale
117 S.W.3d 866 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Freeman, Ex Parte Tyler Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-ex-parte-tyler-anderson-texcrimapp-2008.