Freeman, Etc. v. Scurry

40 A.2d 859, 351 Pa. 279
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 5, 1945
DocketAppeal, 55
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 A.2d 859 (Freeman, Etc. v. Scurry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman, Etc. v. Scurry, 40 A.2d 859, 351 Pa. 279 (Pa. 1945).

Opinion

Opinion by

Me. Justice Hoeace Steen,

On May 12,1931, the Secretary of Banking took possession, as Receiver, of Carbondale Miners and Mechanics Savings Bank, on November 13, 1931, determined to liquidate its affairs, and on January 3, 1944, made an assessment on the stockholders in order to enforce their statutory liability. In the present action against one of the stockholders the affidavit of defense alleged that during the entire thirteen years which elapsed between the time when the Secretary took possession and the time when he made the assessment and demand for payment it was apparent that, because of the great excess of liabilities over assets, such an assessment would be inevitable; therefore it was claimed that the delay in making the demand was unreasonable and the Statute of Limitations was a bar to the action. The court held the affidavit of defense insufficient and gave judgment for plaintiff.

The question involved is ruled, and determined adversely to defendant, by the decision this day rendered in the case of Freeman, Secretary of Banking, v. Rogal, 351 Pa. 266.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harcourt Wells, Inc. v. Cohen
6 Pa. D. & C.3d 183 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.2d 859, 351 Pa. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-etc-v-scurry-pa-1945.