Freeman, Corey Thomas v. State
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. PD-1579-13
COREY THOMAS FREEMAN, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS COLLIN COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Appellant was convicted of online solicitation of a minor under section 33.021 (b) of the Penal Code. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Freeman v. State, No. 05-12- 00923-CR (Tex. App. --Dallas 20 13). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review contending the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the constitutionality of the statute.
This Court granted discretionary review recently in Ex parte Lo in order to address whether section 33.021(b) is unconstitutional. We held it to be unconstitutional on its face due to overbreadth, reversed the decision of the court of appeals, and remanded to the trial court to dismiss the indictment. Ex parte Lo, _ S.W.3d _(Tex. Crim. App. No. PD-1560- 12, delivered October 30, 2013). The State's motion for rehearing was denied on March 19, 2014. The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in Ex parte Lo. Accordingly, we grant Appellant's petition for discretionary review, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further action in light of our opinion in Ex parte Lo.
Delivered April 2, 2014 Publish
OFFICIAL BUSINESS (/)
STATE OF TEXAS ~~
PENALTY FOR £~
PRIVATE USE ~~
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION a..u.
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
PD-1579-13
5TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK LISA MATZ
600 COMMERCE 2ND FLOOR
DALLAS TX 75202
40 CQT-539 75202 l"h·t 1\"t'htl··''' 1·t'h l'tll't'l'll'··t·th ·1 1•Hh l••tllh I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeman, Corey Thomas v. State (Freeman, Corey Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.