Freeland v. Mannahan

New York Court of Chancery

Freeland v. Mannahan

1 Hopk. Ch. 276

DecidedOctober 30, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hopk. Ch. 276 (Freeland v. Mannahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeland v. Mannahan, 1 Hopk. Ch. 276 (N.Y. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

observed;

That the controversy appeared to have been heretofore sub-. mitted to arbitration, and nothing appeared to impeach the fairness of the award, nor any reason why that award might not have been a bar if insisted on; and that the sum theti awarded was not much different from the amount now decreed. For these reasons, though the decree was in favor of the complainants, the court refused costs.

Mr. D. Graham for complainant.

Mr. C. Baldwin for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

observed;

That the controversy appeared to have been heretofore sub-. mitted to arbitration, and nothing appeared to impeach the fairness of the award, nor any reason why that award might not have been a bar if insisted on; and that the sum theti awarded was not much different from the amount now decreed. For these reasons, though the decree was in favor of the complainants, the court refused costs.

Mr. D. Graham for complainant.

Mr. C. Baldwin for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Hopk. Ch. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeland-v-mannahan-nychanct-1824.