Freeland v. Freeland
534 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465, 1988 WL 129123
Opinion
We affirm. The required payment of the second mortgage should be affirmed as either equitable distribution or alimony. We remand to the trial court for clarification as to which of the above classifications was intended. See Zediker v. Zediker, 398 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeland v. Freeland, 534 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465, 1988 WL 129123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
534 So. 2d 890 (Freeland v. Freeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zediker v. Zediker
398 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)