Freeland v. Freeland
534 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465, 1988 WL 129123
This text of 534 So. 2d 890 (Freeland v. Freeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Freeland v. Freeland, 534 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465, 1988 WL 129123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
We affirm. The required payment of the second mortgage should be affirmed as either equitable distribution or alimony. We remand to the trial court for clarification as to which of the above classifications was intended. See Zediker v. Zediker, 398 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zediker v. Zediker
398 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
534 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465, 1988 WL 129123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeland-v-freeland-fladistctapp-1988.