Freeland v. Erie County

2020 NY Slip Op 05435, 187 A.D.3d 1605, 129 N.Y.S.3d 900
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freeland v. Erie County. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 N.Y.S.3d 683
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 2020·No. MOTION NO. (64/20) CA 19-00438.·Published

Opinion

Freeland v Erie County (2020 NY Slip Op 05435)
Freeland v Erie County
2020 NY Slip Op 05435
Decided on October 2, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 2, 2020
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Oct. 2, 2020.)
MOTION NO. (64/20) CA 19-00438.

[*1]GLENN FREELAND AND SUSAN FREELAND, AS ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF TREVELL WALKER, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

ERIE COUNTY, TIMOTHY B. HOWARD, ERIE COUNTY SHERIFF AND MARK WIPPERMAN, ERIE COUNTY UNDERSHERIFF, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeland v. Erie County, 2020 NY Slip Op 05435, 187 A.D.3d 1605, 129 N.Y.S.3d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 05435 (Freeland v. Erie County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431