Freeland Lending, LLC v. Rcjs Properties, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 2019
Docket18-35939
StatusUnpublished

This text of Freeland Lending, LLC v. Rcjs Properties, LLC (Freeland Lending, LLC v. Rcjs Properties, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeland Lending, LLC v. Rcjs Properties, LLC, (9th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 14 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREELAND LENDING, LLC, an Ohio No. 18-35939 limited liability company, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05383-RBL Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

RCJS PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company,

Defendant,

and

RICHARD SORRELS, individually, and the marital community composed of RICHARD SORRELS and "JANE DOE" SORRELS, husband and wife,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 11, 2019**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Richard Sorrels appeals pro se from the district court’s foreclosure judgment

and post-judgment order arising out of Freeland Lending, LLC’s action to enforce

the promissory note and the deed of trust securing a commercial loan. We dismiss.

The notice of appeal identified as the only order on appeal the district court’s

post-judgment order of sale entered on October 2, 2018. However, the order of

sale is not a final and appealable order because it merely directed an execution of

the previously entered judgment of foreclosure. See Am. Ironworks & Erectors,

Inc. v. North Am. Const. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898 (9th Cir. 2001) (“A mere

ministerial order, such as an order executing a judgment . . . is not a final

appealable order.”).

We do not consider the district court’s judgment of foreclosure entered on

September 10, 2018 because the notice of appeal is untimely as to that judgment.

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days

after entry of the judgment appealed from); Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. Smith, 155

F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir. 1998) (holding that foreclosure judgments conclusively

determining liability for defaulted loans and identifying the property to be sold

were final and appealable).

DISMISSED.

2 18-35939

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. Smith
155 F.3d 1097 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Freeland Lending, LLC v. Rcjs Properties, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeland-lending-llc-v-rcjs-properties-llc-ca9-2019.