Freel v. Ferraro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Freel v. Ferraro

276 A.D.2d 585, 715 N.Y.S.2d 325, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10423

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 585 (Freel v. Ferraro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freel v. Ferraro, 276 A.D.2d 585, 715 N.Y.S.2d 325, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated December 3, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant Joseph Ferraro to vacate a prior order of the same court dated May 28, 1999, granting the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter judgment against that defendant upon his default in appearing in the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant Joseph Ferraro to vacate his default in appearing in the action (see, CPLR 5015 [a]; Stone v County of Nassau, 272 AD2d 392; Matter of Long Is. Light. Co. v Assessor of Town of Brookhaven, 251 AD2d 332). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated December 3, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant Joseph Ferraro to vacate a prior order of the same court dated May 28, 1999, granting the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter judgment against that defendant upon his default in appearing in the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant Joseph Ferraro to vacate his default in appearing in the action (see, CPLR 5015 [a]; Stone v County of Nassau, 272 AD2d 392; Matter of Long Is. Light. Co. v Assessor of Town of Brookhaven, 251 AD2d 332). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 585, 715 N.Y.S.2d 325, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freel-v-ferraro-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack