Freehold Trust Co. v. Kelsey
This text of 19 A.2d 779 (Freehold Trust Co. v. Kelsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts herein are sufficiently set forth in the opinion below. It is our conclusion that the trust fund of $25,000 was controlled by the provision of the will restricting investments thereof to bonds and mortgages and the failure of the trustee to comply therewith justified the entry of the decree below. Eor this reason the decree appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKetl, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 A.2d 779, 129 N.J. Eq. 383, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freehold-trust-co-v-kelsey-nj-1941.