Freehold Investments v. Richstone
This text of 42 A.D.2d 696 (Freehold Investments v. Richstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on January 24, 1973, reversed, on the law and on the facts, on the dissenting opinion of Markowitz, P. J., at Appellate Term, and the judgment of Civil Court in favor of tenant-respondent-appellant reinstated. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman and Capozzoli, JJ.; Steuer, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the Per Guriam opinion at Appellate Term. No opinion. [72 Misc 2d 624.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 A.D.2d 696, 346 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freehold-investments-v-richstone-nyappdiv-1973.