Freehold Investments v. Richstone
311 N.E.2d 500, 34 N.Y.2d 612, 355 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1835
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs, and the order of the Appellate Term reinstated in the following memorandum: The evidence persuasively demonstrates, as a matter of law, that the alterations were sufficiently substantial to constitute a significant injury to the reversion, entitling appellant landlord to possession of the premises.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Rabin. Taking no part: Judge Stevens.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freehold Investments v. Richstone, 311 N.E.2d 500, 34 N.Y.2d 612, 355 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1835 (N.Y. 1974).
311 N.E.2d 500 (Freehold Investments v. Richstone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marbar, Inc. v. Katz
183 Misc. 2d 219 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2000)
Mengoni v. Passy
175 Misc. 2d 498 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Britton v. Yazicioglu
189 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Haberman v. Hawkins
170 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Gabin v. Goldstein
131 Misc. 2d 153 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1986)
151 West Associates v. Printsiples Fabric Corp.
92 A.D.2d 76 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In Re Allen Carpet Shops, Inc.
25 B.R. 595 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Harar Realty Corp. v. Michlin & Hill, Inc.
86 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Rumiche Corp. v. Eisenreich
352 N.E.2d 125 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Rumiche Corp. v. Eisenreich
49 A.D.2d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)