Freehold Investments v. Richstone
This text of 311 N.E.2d 500 (Freehold Investments v. Richstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs, and the order of the Appellate Term reinstated in the following memorandum: The evidence persuasively demonstrates, as a matter of law, that the alterations were sufficiently substantial to constitute a significant injury to the reversion, entitling appellant landlord to possession of the premises.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Rabin. Taking no part: Judge Stevens.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 N.E.2d 500, 34 N.Y.2d 612, 355 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freehold-investments-v-richstone-ny-1974.