Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc.

199 F. App'x 954
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 28, 2006·No. No. 2006-1020, 2006-1078, 2006-1079, 2006-1098, 2006-1099, 2006-1194, 2006-1195·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The parties move jointly (1) to remand to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, due to settlement, to allow the district court to act on their joint Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and (2) for an extension of time for Freedom Wireless, Inc. to file its principal brief.

The parties further request that this court’s order allow them to reinstate their appeals without payment of a further appeal fee should the district court either deny the Rule 60(b) motion or fail to act upon it within 80 days. We deem the better course is to allow the parties to file a motion to reinstate if these circumstances arise.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to remand is granted.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc., 199 F. App'x 954 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

199 F. App'x 954 (Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.
468 F. Supp. 2d 359 (D. Connecticut, 2007)