Freedom Graphic Systems, Inc. v. United States

953 F.2d 688, 1992 WL 20721
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 16, 1992
Docket91-5053
StatusUnpublished

This text of 953 F.2d 688 (Freedom Graphic Systems, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freedom Graphic Systems, Inc. v. United States, 953 F.2d 688, 1992 WL 20721 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

Opinion

953 F.2d 688

293 U.S.App.D.C. 292

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
FREEDOM GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 91-5053.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 16, 1992.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss appeal as moot or in the alternative for summary affirmance, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal as moot be granted. Freedom Graphic Systems, Inc. appeals the order of the district court denying its motion for a preliminary injunction. The appeal, however, is moot. Because the contract in question has been fully performed by the successful bidder, injunctive relief prohibiting the award of the contract to Fry Communications is no longer available. See IBTCHWA, Local Union No. 2702 v. Western Air Lines, Inc., 854 F.2d 1178 (9th Cir.1988) (appeal by unions of denial of an injunction prohibiting an airline merger was rendered moot after merger took place).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
953 F.2d 688, 1992 WL 20721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedom-graphic-systems-inc-v-united-states-cadc-1992.