Freedom Fund v. Lvreis, Inc.

2022 Ohio 786

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: March 16, 2022
• Docket: C-210356
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as Freedom Fund v. Lvreis, Inc., 2022-Ohio-786.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

FREEDOM FUND, LLC, : APPEAL NO. C-210356 TRIAL NO. A-1902386 Plaintiff-Appellee, :

vs. : O P I N I O N. LVREIS, INC., :

Defendant-Appellant. :

Civil Appeal From: Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas

Judgment Appealed From Is: Reversed and Case Remanded

Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal: March 16, 2022

Matre Law Group Co., LPA, and James A. Matre, for Plaintiff-Appellee,

McNamee & McNamee, PLL, and Cynthia P. McNamee, for Defendant-Appellant. OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

BOCK, Judge.

{¶1} Defendant-appellant LVREIS, Inc., (“LVREIS”) appeals the trial court’s

judgment quieting the title of real property in favor of plaintiff-appellee Freedom

Fund, LLC, (“Freedom Fund”).

I. Facts and Procedure

{¶2} Freedom Fund is an Idaho-based member-managed investment limited

liability company (“LLC”) created in October 2012. In December 2012, Ray Perron and

Jay Greenwalt registered Freedom Fund with the Ohio secretary of state as a foreign

entity. They filed a certificate of authority along with Freedom Fund’s Idaho and Ohio

registrations. According to the original operating agreement, Freedom Fund was

managed by Perron (47.5 percent interest), Greenwalt (47.5 percent interest), and

Mountain West IRA (“the trust”) (5 percent interest). Its business purpose was to

engage in note and/or real estate acquisition. It was to be managed “by any member

individually or all members jointly.”

{¶3} There were multiple operating agreements in existence, but only the

2012 original operating agreement and the 2012 amended operating agreement were

entered into the record.

{¶4} Article V of the original operating agreement, entitled “Membership

Withdrawal and Transfer Provisions,” provides:

(2) Restrictions on the Transfer of Membership: A member shall not

transfer his or her membership in the LLC unless all non-transferring

members in the LLC first agree to approve the admission of the

transferee into this LLC. Further, no member may encumber a part or

all of his or her membership in the LLC mortgage, pledge, granting of a 2 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

security interest, lien, or otherwise, unless the encumbrance has first

been approved in writing by all other members of the LLC.

Notwithstanding the above provision, any member shall be

allowed to assign an economic interest in his or her membership to

another person without the approval of the other members. Such an

assignment shall not include a transfer of the member’s voting or

management rights in this LLC, and the assignee shall not become a

member of the LLC.

{¶5} Article VII, entitled “General Provisions,” provides:

(3) All Necessary Acts: Any member individually or all members jointly

and Officers of this LLC are authorized to perform all acts necessary to

perfect the organization of this LLC and to carry out its business

operations expeditiously and efficiently. * * * other officers, or all

members jointly of the LLC, may certify to other businesses, financial

institutions and individuals as to the authority of one or more members

or officers of this LLC to transact specific items of business on behalf of

the LLC.

{¶6} The 2012 “Certification of Authority,” filed with the original operating

agreement in Ohio, states:

This LLC is managed by its Members * * * Each of these persons has

managerial authority of the LLC and is empowered to transact business

on its behalf.

{¶7} Later in October 2012, Perron signed a “Sale and Assignment

Agreement,” purporting to assign all of Freedom Fund’s membership interest to Loan

3 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

Buddies, an Idaho LLC, as collateral for a loan to acquire real property in Ohio. Julie

Myers, the manager of Loan Buddies, was named Freedom Fund’s new manager.

{¶8} The real property located at 340 Glensprings Drive, City of Springdale,

Hamilton County, Ohio 45246 (“Glensprings property”) was one of the properties that

Freedom Fund acquired with the loan. The parties also signed an “Option Agreement,”

which allowed Perron to buy the membership interest back once the loan was repaid.

The record is devoid of any documents showing that Greenwalt or the trust conveyed

any of their interest to Loan Buddies.

{¶9} In November 2012, Loan Buddies filed an amended operating

agreement with the Idaho secretary of state to convert Freedom Fund from a member-

managed LLC to a manager-managed LLC. Myers purportedly amended the filings to

make Loan Buddies the sole member of Freedom Fund and to name herself manager

“responsible for the management of the company’s business and activities with all

rights and powers generally conferred by law or necessary * * *.”

{¶10} In October 2015, Greenwalt signed a $90,000 promissory note secured

by a mortgage on the Glensprings property. LVREIS, a Nevada private lending

corporation, was the holder of the note and mortgage. No other Freedom Fund

member signed the mortgage. The parties stipulated that the LVREIS mortgage was

recorded with the Hamilton County recorder.

{¶11} In June 2016, eight months after the LVREIS loan was recorded, Myers,

signing as the manager of Freedom Fund, recorded a mortgage that was held by Loan

Buddies with the Hamilton County recorder.

{¶12} In January 2018, LVREIS paid $23,263.70 in delinquent real estate

taxes on the Glensprings property after the Hamilton County treasurer filed for a tax

4 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

foreclosure against it, naming Freedom Fund and LVREIS as codefendants. LVREIS

subsequently paid another $8,628.82 and $4,501.20 to satisfy the 2019 and 2020 real

estate taxes and assessments, for a total of $36,393.09.

A. The Lawsuit

{¶13} In May 2019, Freedom Fund filed a complaint to quiet the title to the

Glensprings property in its favor. In its complaint, it alleged that Greenwalt was not a

“member, manager, officer or agent of Freedom Fund” when he signed the LVREIS

mortgage, and that Greenwalt had no authority to do so.

{¶14} In August 2019, LVREIS (1) answered Freedom Fund’s complaint, (2)

counterclaimed to quiet title, and for declaratory judgment, breach of note, and

foreclosure; and (3) filed a third-party complaint against Greenwalt.

B. The Trial

{¶15} The parties confirmed that there was no stipulation as to who actually

received the money loaned by LVREIS.

Gary Clark’s Testimony

{¶16} Clark, a member of Loan Buddies, testified that Greenwalt and Perron

were the faces of Freedom Fund and the “boots on the ground” in Ohio from 2012 until

2016. He stated that Perron and Greenwalt had no authority to mortgage the

Glensprings property. Clark testified that he did not know who paid the delinquent

taxes on the Glensprings property until the matter had been dismissed.

{¶17} Clark conceded that there was no document signed by both Perron and

Greenwalt transferring their membership interest in Freedom Fund.

{¶18} Clark testified that Loan Buddies filed a mortgage on the Glensprings

property in 2016—eight months after the LVREIS mortgage was signed—because its

5 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

attorney told them to. Clark further testified that Freedom Fund never received any of

the proceeds from the LVREIS loan.

Richard P. Turner’s Testimony

{¶19} Turner, the title agent who handled the closing on the 2015 LVREIS

mortgage, testified that:

There was an issue with Ray Perron. * * * there was a delay in the

funding of the loan because he was expected to sign that guaranty * * *

there is no signature in the file. I thought that was resolved because they

funded the loan at that point.

{¶20} Upon the court’s inquiry as to whether the title company had disbursed

the funds and to whom the funds were disbursed, Turner testified:

* * * there was a simultaneous closing with an entity wholly owned by

Jay Greenwalt and Ray Perron by the name of Vendi, LLC. At the same

time that they closed this transaction with us they bought another

property.

Trial Court’s Judgment

{¶21} The trial court first found that Freedom Fund had no authority to

transfer its members’ interests to Loan Buddies under the 2012 assignment

agreement. It determined that the 2012 assignment agreement conveyed no part of

Greenwalt’s membership interest—or that of the trust—and that it may have been

effective only to convey Perron’s 47.5 percent interest, by estoppel, because he signed

it on behalf of Freedom Fund. The court concluded that Greenwalt had retained his

membership interest “along with whatever authority he had as a member.”

6 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

{¶22} The trial court further found that, because Loan Buddies was not

Freedom Fund’s sole member, the amended operating agreement did not strip

Greenwalt of his authority as a member.

{¶23} The court analyzed Idaho Code Section 30-25-407(b)(4) and R.C.

1705.25(A)(2) and determined that Greenwalt’s mortgaging Freedom Fund’s assets for

another company’s benefit was outside of the ordinary course of business. Further, it

determined that LVREIS knew that Greenwalt was purchasing property for another

company with the proceeds of the loan without any benefit flowing to Freedom Fund.

Therefore, it concluded that Greenwalt had no authority, actual or implied, to

mortgage the Glensprings property.

{¶24} Moreover, the trial court concluded that Freedom Fund’s knowledge of

the mortgage and LVREIS’s payment of the real estate taxes did not amount to

Freedom Fund ratifying the mortgage because it was not “fully informed of all of the

material facts to the agent[’]s action.” The court found that the facts did not establish

that Freedom Fund knew that funds were used to purchase property for a different

company. Freedom Fund’s knowledge of the mortgage and payment of taxes was

insufficient to show that Freedom Fund was fully informed of Greenwalt’s self-dealing,

and therefore did not establish ratification.

Law

{¶25} The standard of review following a civil bench trial is whether the trial

court’s judgment is against the manifest weight of the evidence as supported by

competent, credible evidence. CyrusOne, LLC v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 2021-Ohio-1971,

174 N.E.3d 41, ¶ 48 (1st Dist.). Under a manifest-weight-of-the-evidence review, every

7 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

reasonable presumption must be made in favor of the judgment and the findings of

fact. Id.

{¶26} The interpretation of statutes and written contracts are questions of law

that are reviewed de novo. State v. Straley, 139 Ohio St.3d 339, 2014-Ohio-2139, 11

N.E.3d 1175, ¶ 9 (statutory interpretation is a matter of law reviewed de novo); Hyde

Park Circle, L.L.C. v. Cincinnati, 2016-Ohio-3130, 66 N.E.3d 99, ¶ 15 (1st Dist.) (the

interpretation of contracts is reviewed de novo).

{¶27} Contracts that are clear and unambiguous will be enforced according to

their terms. Retirement Corp. of Am. v. Henning, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-180643,

2019-Ohio-4589, ¶ 18. “A court must construe a contract against its drafter, but when

the terms are unambiguous and clear on their face, the court need not look beyond the

plain language of the contract to determine the rights and obligations of the parties.”

World Harvest Church v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 148 Ohio St.3d 11, 2016-Ohio-2913,

68 N.E.3d 738, ¶ 36, quoting Beasley v. Monoko, Inc., 195 Ohio App.3d 93, 2011-Ohio-

3995, 958 N.E.2d 1003, ¶ 30 (10th Dist.).

Analysis

{¶28} In its sole assignment of error, LVREIS asserts that the trial court erred

by quieting title in the Glensprings property in favor of Freedom Fund and by finding

that the LVREIS mortgage on the Glensprings property was void.

A. Greenwalt Remained a Member of Freedom Fund

{¶29} Idaho Code Section 30-25-105 provides that with some exceptions, an

LLC’s operating agreement governs the LLC’s and its members’ rights, duties,

relationships, activities, and conditions for amending the operating agreement.

8 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

Moreover, “to the extent the operating agreement does not provide for a matter

described in subsection (a) of this section, this chapter governs the matter.”

{¶30} Thus, under Idaho law, the express terms of an LLC’s operating

agreement controls over statute. Ohio law is similar—R.C. 1705.081(A) provides that

an LLC’s operating agreement governs the LLC’s relationships. Therefore, applicable

state laws are defaults and only control where an LLC’s operating agreement is silent.

{¶31} The trial court correctly concluded that Greenwalt remained a member

of Freedom Fund. Article V(2) of the operating agreement states that a member cannot

transfer his or her membership in Freedom Fund unless all of the nontransferring

members approve the transfer. The record does not contain approval by Greenwalt or

the trust, as the nontransferring members, to permit any member to transfer

membership. Even if Perron successfully transferred his own interest in Freedom

Fund, Greenwalt and the trust remained members because neither consented to

transferring their interests.

B. Greenwalt Had Authority to Mortgage the Glensprings Property

{¶32} Generally, when an agent enters into a contract on behalf of a principal,

the principal will be bound by the terms of that contract, so long as the agent was acting

with actual or implied authority to enter into the contract. Mtge. Network, Inc. v.

Ameribanc Mtge. Lending, LLC, 177 Ohio App.3d 733, 2008-Ohio-4112, 895 N.E.2d

917 (1oth Dist.).

{¶33} The amended operating agreement that Loan Buddies filed with the

Idaho secretary of state—which purported to convert Freedom Fund from a member-

managed LLC to a manager-managed LLC, named Loan Buddies as the sole owner of

Freedom Fund, and named Myers manager of Freedom Fund—was invalid because

9 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

Greenwalt had not transferred his interest. As such, we look to relevant statutory

provisions and original operating agreement to determine whether Greenwalt had

authority to mortgage the Glensprings property.

Actual Authority

{¶34} Express authority is authority that is “directly granted to or conferred

upon the agent or employee in express terms by the principal, and it extends only to

such powers as the principal gives the agent in direct terms.” (Citations omitted.) Nee

v. State Industries, Inc. Express, 2013-Ohio-4794, 2 N.E.3d 129o, ¶ 63 (8th Dist.).

Implied authority may also arise from the express delegation of actual authority and

carries with it the power to do all that which is reasonably necessary to carry into effect

the power actually conferred. Id.

{¶35} Freedom Fund’s original operating agreement, which names Greenwalt,

Perron, and the trust as members of Freedom Fund, specifically states that “[t]his LLC

shall be managed by any member individually or all members jointly.”

{¶36} Article VII of the original operating agreement allowed individual

members to “perform all acts necessary to carry out its business operations

expeditiously and efficiently.” Further, Greenwalt individually could certify to

financial institutions that he had authority to “transact specific items of business on

behalf of the LLC.”

{¶37} The trial court relied on Idaho Code Section 30-25-407, which requires

affirmative consent of all members to take action outside of an LLC’s ordinary course

of business.

{¶38} As discussed above, Freedom Fund’s operating agreement controls

Greenwalt’s authority, other than when the operating agreement is silent. Moreover,

10 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

Freedom Fund’s business purpose was to acquire notes and real estate. Its operating

agreement gave members the authority to carry on the business of Freedom Fund

jointly or individually.

{¶39} Greenwalt’s acts—regardless of who benefitted—were encompassed in

Freedom Fund’s business purpose. Greenwalt was authorized to transact Freedom

Fund’s business (acquiring notes and real estate) and to certify to LVREIS that he had

{¶40} Additionally, former R.C. 1705.35 bolsters LVREIS’s position:

“Instruments and documents providing for the acquisition, mortgage, or disposition

of property of a limited liability company are valid and binding upon the company if

the instruments or documents are executed by one or more members of the company

* * *.”

{¶41} Former R.C. 1705.35 does not conflict with any provision in the

operating agreement. It is clear that Greenwalt was a member of Freedom Fund when

he signed the documents with LVREIS. Therefore, former R.C. 1705.35, in conjunction

with Articles II and VII of the original operating agreement, renders Greenwalt’s

signature on the mortgage valid and binds Freedom Fund.

{¶42} LVREIS’s sole assignment of error is sustained.

Conclusion

{¶43} Greenwalt had actual authority to execute the LVREIS loan documents.

Therefore, we do not analyze apparent authority or ratification. We reverse the trial

court’s judgment and remand this matter to the trial court to conduct proceedings

consistent with this court’s opinion.

11 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

BERGERON, P.J., and WINKLER, J., concur.

Please note:

The court has recorded its entry on the date of the release of this opinion