Freedman v. Spicer Manufacturing Corp.
116 A. 427, 97 N.J.L. 325, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 197
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For afjirmcMice — Trie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trencbiard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freedman v. Spicer Manufacturing Corp., 116 A. 427, 97 N.J.L. 325, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 197 (N.J. 1922).
116 A. 427 (Freedman v. Spicer Manufacturing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franquet v. Imperial Management Corp.
341 A.2d 881 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Lampkin v. Harzfeld's
407 S.W.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1966)
Atiles Moréu v. Industrial Commission
85 P.R. 209 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1962)
Atiles Moreu v. Comisión Industrial
85 P.R. Dec. 218 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1962)
Henderson v. Celanese Corp.
104 A.2d 720 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.
77 A.2d 467 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Saintsing v. Steinbach Company
64 A.2d 99 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Protectu Awning Shutter Co. v. Cline
16 So. 2d 342 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Brink v. H. Earl Clack Co.
96 P.2d 500 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)
Baltimore Towage & Lighterage Co. v. Shenton
199 A. 806 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1938)
Hall v. Doremus
171 A. 781 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1934)
Spicer Manufacturing Co. v. Tucker
189 N.E. 870 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1934)
Neudeck v. Ford Motor Co.
229 N.W. 438 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1930)