Freedman v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT one SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS On HOUSTON DIVISION

MARVIN FREEDMAN, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO, 4:23-CV-02204 § SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, § et al., § § Defendants. § ORDER Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho’s Memorandum and Recommendation filed on June 12, 2024. Doc. #35. The deadline for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation for clear error. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation in its entirety. Therefore, Defendant Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #26) is hereby GRANTED. It is so ORDERED.

JUL 03 2074 Date The Honorable Alffed H. Bennett United States Distrlet Judge