Freedman v. Robbins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Freedman v. Robbins

234 A.D. 868

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 868 (Freedman v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freedman v. Robbins, 234 A.D. 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and' order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. Plaintiff’s claim is based on an alleged original promise made by the defendant to the Maxol Plumbing Supply Company, a copartnership, and the assignors of the plaintiff, to pay for certain materials ordered by Stoerzinger who had a contract with the defendant to do the plumbing work. The plaintiff’s claim is negatived by the exhibits in the record and the verdict is against the weight of evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and' order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. Plaintiff’s claim is based on an alleged original promise made by the defendant to the Maxol Plumbing Supply Company, a copartnership, and the assignors of the plaintiff, to pay for certain materials ordered by Stoerzinger who had a contract with the defendant to do the plumbing work. The plaintiff’s claim is negatived by the exhibits in the record and the verdict is against the weight of evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedman-v-robbins-nyappdiv-1931.