Freedman v. Montague Associates, Inc.
This text of 9 A.D.2d 936 (Freedman v. Montague Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover brokerage commissions, the appeal is from an order granting a motion for summary judgment dismissing the supplemental complaint, and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, the record, presents questions of fact which should be resolved [937]*937after trial. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Hallinan, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order and judgment for the reasons stated by the learned Justice at the Special Term. Murphy, J., deceased. [18 Misc 2d 1.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.2d 936, 195 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedman-v-montague-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1959.