Freedman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 262 A.D. 1037 (Freedman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover under a double indemnity provision contained in each of two policies of life insurance issued by the defendant, judgment for defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order denying motion for a new trial dismissed, without costs. There is no such order in the record. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 1037, 30 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedman-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1941.