Freedman v. Kramer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Freedman v. Kramer

97 N.Y.S. 1134

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 27, 1906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff owed defend ant $30 for the June rent, and the fact of thi fire did not cancel this indebtedness. The evi dence that the premises were rendered “uninhab ¡table and wholly unfair for occupancy” wa; slight, but we do not feel called upon to overruh the decision of the trial justice on this point The judgment must be modified, by deducting the $30 owed by plaintiff to defendant, and, a¡ modified, affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff owed defend ant $30 for the June rent, and the fact of thi fire did not cancel this indebtedness. The evi dence that the premises were rendered “uninhab ¡table and wholly unfair for occupancy” wa; slight, but we do not feel called upon to overruh the decision of the trial justice on this point The judgment must be modified, by deducting the $30 owed by plaintiff to defendant, and, a¡ modified, affirmed, without costs.

Freedman v. Kramer, 97 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

97 N.Y.S. 1134 (Freedman v. Kramer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.