Freedman v. Kramer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Freedman v. Kramer

97 N.Y.S. 1134

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 97 N.Y.S. 1134 (Freedman v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freedman v. Kramer, 97 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff owed defend ant $30 for the June rent, and the fact of thi fire did not cancel this indebtedness. The evi dence that the premises were rendered “uninhab ¡table and wholly unfair for occupancy” wa; slight, but we do not feel called upon to overruh the decision of the trial justice on this point The judgment must be modified, by deducting the $30 owed by plaintiff to defendant, and, a¡ modified, affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff owed defend ant $30 for the June rent, and the fact of thi fire did not cancel this indebtedness. The evi dence that the premises were rendered “uninhab ¡table and wholly unfair for occupancy” wa; slight, but we do not feel called upon to overruh the decision of the trial justice on this point The judgment must be modified, by deducting the $30 owed by plaintiff to defendant, and, a¡ modified, affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedman-v-kramer-nyappterm-1906.