Freedman v. Clinton Court Corp.
254 A.D. 643, 3 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6848
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
— Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Rickman v. Stanley Mark Strand Carp. (241 App. Div. 633; affd., 266 N. Y. 494). All concur, except Crosby and Lewis, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment affirms a judgment of the Rochester City Court in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of falling on a stairway.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freedman v. Clinton Court Corp., 254 A.D. 643, 3 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
254 A.D. 643 (Freedman v. Clinton Court Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gramm v. State
28 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Spaulding v. Christakos
269 A.D. 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)