Freedman v. Clinton Court Corp.
This text of 254 A.D. 643 (Freedman v. Clinton Court Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Rickman v. Stanley Mark Strand Carp. (241 App. Div. 633; affd., 266 N. Y. 494). All concur, except Crosby and Lewis, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment affirms a judgment of the Rochester City Court in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of falling on a stairway.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 643, 3 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedman-v-clinton-court-corp-nyappdiv-1938.