Freedman v. Amdur

160 So. 2d 131
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 1964·No. No. 64-60·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed a petition for issuance of a writ of certiorari to review an interlocutory order in a common law action refusing to require the respondent, Joseph Amdur [defendant in the trial court] to answer certain oral interrogatories. This petition is addressed to the discretion of this court [see: Easley v. The Garden Sanctuary, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 120 So.2d 59, 78 A.L.R.2d 1199; Flagler Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n. v. Whiting, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 555] and, following a review of it and the supporting brief and transcript, the court declines to entertain the petition and dismisses same, without prejudice to the petitioner [upon appropriate final appellate proceedings] seeking a review of the order here under consideration.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman v. Amdur, 160 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

160 So. 2d 131 (Freedman v. Amdur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flanagan v. Shamblen
429 So. 2d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Leithauser v. Harrison
168 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)