Freedman v. Amdur

160 So. 2d 131
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 1964
DocketNo. 64-60
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 So. 2d 131 (Freedman v. Amdur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freedman v. Amdur, 160 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed a petition for issuance of a writ of certiorari to review an interlocutory order in a common law action refusing to require the respondent, Joseph Amdur [defendant in the trial court] to answer certain oral interrogatories. This petition is addressed to the discretion of this court [see: Easley v. The Garden Sanctuary, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 120 So.2d 59, 78 A.L.R.2d 1199; Flagler Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n. v. Whiting, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 555] and, following a review of it and the supporting brief and transcript, the court declines to entertain the petition and dismisses same, without prejudice to the petitioner [upon appropriate final appellate proceedings] seeking a review of the order here under consideration.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flanagan v. Shamblen
429 So. 2d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Leithauser v. Harrison
168 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 2d 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedman-v-amdur-fladistctapp-1964.