Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 247, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1353
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Cust. Ct. 305
United States Customs Court·Decided February 24, 1949·No. No. 52891; protests 939926-G (A), etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of vertical field balances similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of Abstract 52267 and American Askania Corporation v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 26, C. D. 1121). Since submitting the case upon stipulation, counsel for plaintiffs abandoned protest 939926-G (A)/47618. The abandoned protest was therefore dismissed. With regard to the two remaining protests, i. e., protests 939926-G (B)/47486 and 964550-G/50572, following the cited authorities, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 247, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1353 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 247 (Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Askania Corp. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 26 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)