Freed v. Bank of Aurora

1925 OK 843, 240 P. 618, 113 Okla. 186, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 945
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 20, 1925·No. 16669·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is appealed from the district court of Tulsa county, and defendant in error moves to dismiss on the ground that case-made was not served within the time provided by statute, nor within any valid extension of time. Judgment was rendered on the 7th day of February, 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was allowed 30 days from date in which to serve case-made, which expired on the 9th day of March, 1925. On the 10th day of March, 1925, the time was extended 20 days, and after other extensions, case-made was finally served on the 6th day of August, 1925.

The order of March 10th is void and casgmade' is nullity, and this court without jurisdiction' to review the appeal. Hoggard v. Conservative Loan Company, 101 Okla. 14, 222 Pac. 674.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freed v. Bank of Aurora, 1925 OK 843, 240 P. 618, 113 Okla. 186, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 945 (Okla. 1925).

1925 OK 843 (Freed v. Bank of Aurora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoggard v. Conservative Loan Co.
1924 OK 72 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)