Freechas Realty Co. v. Hall

259 A.D. 1022, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 1940·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, in so far as appealed from, denying motion of the plaintiff to strike out as insufficient two affirmative defenses contained in the answer, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. On its face, it appears that the complaint is defective in that a declaratory judgment is sought although the same issue is pending in a proceeding before another court, which presumably has jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the assignment. If for any reason the issue may not or cannot be determined in the Orphans’ Court for the City and County of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, appropriate allegations to that effect should have been set forth affirmatively in the complaint. There are no such allegations. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freechas Realty Co. v. Hall, 259 A.D. 1022, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 1022 (Freechas Realty Co. v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hotel Martha Washington Management Co. v. Swinick
67 Misc. 2d 390 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1971)
Hamlin v. Nolan
22 Misc. 2d 180 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Storer v. Ripley
283 A.D. 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)