Freeborn v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeborn v. Sanders

579 S.W.3d 259

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2019·No. No. ED 106750·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The plaintiff, Laura Freeborn, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following a jury verdict awarding her damages of $ 5,000 in her action against the defendant, Neil Sanders, for personal injuries the plaintiff suffered following a motor-vehicle accident. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The plaintiff, Laura Freeborn, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following a jury verdict awarding her damages of $ 5,000 in her action against the defendant, Neil Sanders, for personal injuries the plaintiff suffered following a motor-vehicle accident. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Freeborn v. Sanders, 579 S.W.3d 259 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

579 S.W.3d 259 (Freeborn v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.