Freeborn v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeborn v. Sanders

579 S.W.3d 259

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 7, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106750

StatusPublished

This text of 579 S.W.3d 259 (Freeborn v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeborn v. Sanders, 579 S.W.3d 259 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The plaintiff, Laura Freeborn, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following a jury verdict awarding her damages of $ 5,000 in her action against the defendant, Neil Sanders, for personal injuries the plaintiff suffered following a motor-vehicle accident. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The plaintiff, Laura Freeborn, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following a jury verdict awarding her damages of $ 5,000 in her action against the defendant, Neil Sanders, for personal injuries the plaintiff suffered following a motor-vehicle accident. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

579 S.W.3d 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeborn-v-sanders-moctapp-2019.