Freeborn v. Denman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Freeborn v. Denman

7 N.J.L. 190

DecidedMay 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.J.L. 190 (Freeborn v. Denman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeborn v. Denman, 7 N.J.L. 190 (N.J. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

We are- all of opinion, that this demurrer is supported; that an assignment of errors is a proper subject of demurrer, and that you cannot assign error in fact and error in law together. If you think that the assignment of errors may be amended, wo will hear you on that subject.

Scudder then applied for leave to amend the assignment of errors, and cited 1 Arch. Prac. 215; Fitzg. 268, and Rev. Laws 140-1, to shew that the court had the power to grant the rule to amend.

Ber Curiam.

You may take your rule ^to amend, on payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

We are- all of opinion, that this demurrer is supported; that an assignment of errors is a proper subject of demurrer, and that you cannot assign error in fact and error in law together. If you think that the assignment of errors may be amended, wo will hear you on that subject.

Scudder then applied for leave to amend the assignment of errors, and cited 1 Arch. Prac. 215; Fitzg. 268, and Rev. Laws 140-1, to shew that the court had the power to grant the rule to amend.

Ber Curiam.

You may take your rule ^to amend, on payment of costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.J.L. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeborn-v-denman-nj-1824.