FREEBARIN v. State
23 So. 3d 170, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846, 2009 WL 3349546
This text of 23 So. 3d 170 (FREEBARIN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
FREEBARIN v. State, 23 So. 3d 170, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846, 2009 WL 3349546 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation; however, remand is required for entry of an order specifying the conditions which Appellant was determined to have violated. *171 See Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jones v. State
638 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 So. 3d 170, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846, 2009 WL 3349546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freebarin-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.