FREEBARIN v. State
23 So. 3d 170, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846, 2009 WL 3349546
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation; however, remand is required for entry of an order specifying the conditions which Appellant was determined to have violated. *171 See Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
FREEBARIN v. State, 23 So. 3d 170, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846, 2009 WL 3349546 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
23 So. 3d 170 (FREEBARIN v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
638 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)