Free v. Hukill
This text of 44 Ala. 197 (Free v. Hukill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
B. F. SAFFOLD, J.
The questions at issue on error, in this case, are the same as those determined in the case of Free v. Howard, Adm’r, at the present term, except that, in the motion to quash the attachment, an additional ground is alleged, to-wit, that the cause for which it was issued is not embraced in the statute.
The affidavit states that the defendant “ is endeavoring fraudulently and clandestinely to dispose of his effects,” &c. This expresses the substance of the case prescribed in the 6th subdivision of section 2928 of the Revised Code.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Ala. 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/free-v-hukill-ala-1870.