Free Sewing Mach. Co. v. Maund

Fifth Circuit

Free Sewing Mach. Co. v. Maund

222 F. 1022, 137 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1522

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 5, 1915·No. No. 2702·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the trial court, dismissing the petition •of creditors, was rendered July 23, 1914, and the F. A. Ames Company filed its petition to intervene on August 4, 1914. It follows that, when the ■cause was disposed of, the F. A. Ames Company was not a party to the proceeding, and therefore had no standing in court. Besides, it. has no standing here, since it is not a party to the appeal, nor does it complain, by assigning error, of the ruling of the court. In dismissing the petition of the •creditors, the trial court was right, and the decree is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the trial court, dismissing the petition •of creditors, was rendered July 23, 1914, and the F. A. Ames Company filed its petition to intervene on August 4, 1914. It follows that, when the ■cause was disposed of, the F. A. Ames Company was not a party to the proceeding, and therefore had no standing in court. Besides, it. has no standing here, since it is not a party to the appeal, nor does it complain, by assigning error, of the ruling of the court. In dismissing the petition of the •creditors, the trial court was right, and the decree is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free Sewing Mach. Co. v. Maund, 222 F. 1022, 137 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1522 (5th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

222 F. 1022 (Free Sewing Mach. Co. v. Maund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.