Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor

Fourth Circuit

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4162, 1996 WL 2743

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 1996

Docket95-6774

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor, 73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4162, 1996 WL 2743 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; J. Mueller, Counselor,
Augusta Correctional Center; B. Brereton,
Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6774.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Virginia Dep't of Corr., No. CA-94-224-R (W.D.Va. May 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRME.D

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; J. Mueller, Counselor,
Augusta Correctional Center; B. Brereton,
Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6774.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Virginia Dep't of Corr., No. CA-94-224-R (W.D.Va. May 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRME.D

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4162, 1996 WL 2743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredrick-lynwood-foley-v-virginia-department-of-co-ca4-1996.