Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor

Fourth Circuit

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4162, 1996 WL 2743

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 4, 1996·No. 95-6774·Published

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; J. Mueller, Counselor,
Augusta Correctional Center; B. Brereton,
Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6774.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Virginia Dep't of Corr., No. CA-94-224-R (W.D.Va. May 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRME.D

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; J. Mueller, Counselor,
Augusta Correctional Center; B. Brereton,
Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6774.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Virginia Dep't of Corr., No. CA-94-224-R (W.D.Va. May 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRME.D

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor, 73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4162, 1996 WL 2743 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

73 F.3d 357 (Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Virginia Department of Corrections J. Mueller, Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center B. Brereton, Counselor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.