Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Sergeant Talbert, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Sergeant Starkey, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Major L.R. Day

60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26153
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 7, 1995
Docket95-6497
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 821 (Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Sergeant Talbert, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Sergeant Starkey, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Major L.R. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Sergeant Talbert, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Sergeant Starkey, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Major L.R. Day, 60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26153 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 821
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Sergeant TALBERT, Defendant--Appellee.
Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Sergeant STARKEY, Defendant--Appellee.
Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Major L.R. DAY, Defendant--Appellee.

Nos. 95-6497, 95-6498, 95-6499.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 7, 1995.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, appellant pro se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we consolidate the appeals and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Talbert, No. CA-95-211-R; Foley v. Starkey, No. CA-95-0268-R; Foley v. Day, No. CA-95-269-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 8, 1995, and Mar. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredrick-lynwood-foley-v-sergeant-talbert-fredrick-ca4-1995.